Health Equity

Medicaid Enrollment Touches 39% of the Residents of The District of Columbia; DC’s 70/30 FMAP is Vital for the Maintenance of Health & Human Services

A reduction in the District’s FMAP would not lead to long-term government savings and would have a ripple effect throughout the entire health system in the DMV, crippling access to care for not only Medicaid beneficiaries but also all those who live, work, and visit the District of Columbia, including members of Congress and their staffs.

 

What Medicaid Cuts Actually Cost

Why does DC receive an Enhanced FMAP Rate?

The DC FMAP rate of 70% established by the Revitalization Act resulted from bipartisan analysis, discussion, and negotiation by Congressional leadership aiming to balance fairness with the District’s restricted ability to generate revenue. Congress recognized that the District of Columbia faces unique financial challenges due to its non-state status and the significant amount of federally-owned land within its boundaries. The District is unable to tax non-residents’ earnings, so these workers pay no taxes to support the infrastructure and services, such as roads, public safety and emergency services that they benefit from in the District. The District is also unable to tax up to 40% of the real property within its borders due to statutory restrictions.

Why are we concerned about DC's FMAP now?

Members of Congress have proposed reducing the DC FMAP to the statutory minimum for all other states, which is currently 50% (but could be reduced even more). Such a change would impact every physician and every practice, regardless of type, location, and payers contracted. Even practices who take no insurance will not be able to send patients for specialist care, hospital admissions, or other types of care.

What can MSDC members do?

  • If you know a member of Congress or staffer, reach out to them and share how DC cuts will hurt your patients.
  • Share your relationships and outreach with hay@msdc.org so we can help coordinate advocacy efforts.
  • Email hay@msdc.org if you would like to be paired with a physician member of Congress office and trained by MSDC staff on how to reach out.

Resources

  • DC FMAP cut fact sheet
  • California Medical Association fact sheet on Medicaid cuts
  • MSDC and healthcare association letter to Congress arguing against DC FMAP changes.
  • MSDC original story on Medicaid changes.

News, Statements, and Testimony on Health Equity Issues

 

 

Report: DC MCO Had 20% Prior Auth Denial Rate

Sep 7, 2023, 16:56 PM by MSDC Staff
A report using 2019 data showed that DC MCOs had high prior auth denial rates but DC lacked enforcement or review.

In 2019, a DC Managed Care Organization (MCO) denied 20% of prior authorizations submitted, higher than any other state.

A recently published report by the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) Office of the Inspector General reveals the District government lacks recommended oversight procedures for overseeing prior authorizations in the managed care system. In 2019 - the most recent year for data - that led to very high rates of denials by District MCOs. See the entire report here.

The report comes from Congressional requests to HHS on how MCOs are providing patient care. The OIG reviewed data from the largest MCOs nationally and compared their denial rates nationally and at the state level. For DC, this meant AmeriHealth and Amerigroup were included in the study. The most recent year data was available was 2019.

Nationally, AmeriHealth Caritas had a prior auth denial rate of 6.1%. DC's denial rate was 20%, the highest in any state AmeriHealth served. Anthem, Amerigroup's parent company, had a 12.9% denial rate nationally but "only" a 14.1% denial rate in the District.

Even more disturbing is the lack of documented oversight into this process by the District government. The study looked at three oversight categories:

  • States regularly reviewed prior authorization denials for appropriateness
  • State used denials data for oversight
  • State offered external medical reviews

DC did not meet the criteria for the second or third, and was labelled as "ad hoc" for the first.

This data shows the importance of ensuring all payers, including the MCOs, are included in B25-124, the Prior Authorization Reform Amendment Act. You can help us pass this important legislation by: