Physician Voices for Patient Safety

What can you do?

  1. Email your Councilmembers
  2. Call your Councilmembers (numbers here and FAQ talking points here)
  3. Download and share our infographic
  4. Share this information with your colleagues


On this page:

About the bill
Impact on patients in DC
Impact of physicians in DC
What can you do?
Resources

About the bill

In November 2023, DC Health introduced B25-545, the Health Occupations Revisions General Amendment Act of 2023. This bill is a comprehensive rewrite of the law overseeing medical licensing and regulation in Washington, DC.

Unfortunately, the bill as written would overhaul scope of practice, place allied health professionals in oversight positions of medical licensing, and remove the physician from the center of the care team.

MSDC has long advocated that a physician is the most qualified professional at the head of a care team. Physicians have the most health education and pre-practice experience of any health professional, and thus must be involved in all but the most mundane health care decisions. Allied health professionals are a valuable part of the care team, but their medical education and experience limits their role.

The Medical Society of the District of Columbia (MSDC) is the leading voice for physicians in Washington, DC, committed to uniting physicians to advocate for physician-led health care in Washington, DC that protects patients from harm and increases access to quality care. MSDC is leading a coalition of Washington, DC specialty medical societies to advocate against the Health Occupations Revisions General Amendment Act of 2023.

 

Impact on patients

As currently written, the bill would weaken patient care by expanding the ability of non-physician professionals to practice medicine beyond their training. DC residents deserve access to proper medical care from professionals with the right knowledge and experience to ensure appropriate diagnosis and treatment.

Impact on physicians

Below is a breakdown of some of the major changes the bill would introduce, click on the title to expand how the bill would change that item.

 

Board of Medicine

Currently the Board of Medicine is composed of 10 physicians and 4 members of the public. The bill as amended would reduce the number of physicians to 9 and adds 2 physician assistants but keep the four members of the public health.

Advanced Practice Registered Nurses

The concern: The bill would codify that APRNs could independently diagnose, prescribe, and administer medicine.

The details: See the analysis from G2L Law Firm on the APRN provisions | See our one-pager on this issue that you can share with colleagues and the Council

The solutions: Independent Advanced Certified Nurse Practitioners should have a defined scope of practice limited to the following functions:

  • Practice only in the field of certification;
  • Comprehensive physical assessment of patients;
  • Certify to the clerk of the court that an adult has given birth;
  • Certify to the Transportation authority that an individual has special needs for certain health reasons;
  • Complete date of birth and medical information on a birth certificate;
  • Complete a death certificate if medical examiner does not take charge and deceased was under the care of the PN;
  • Establish medical diagnosis of common short-term and chronic stable health problems;
  • File a replacement death certificate;
  • Issue a “do not resuscitate order” in medical emergencies;
  • Order, perform, and interpret laboratory and diagnostic tests;Prescribe drugs and devices under DC controlled substance Schedules II-V with a valid DEA license, and medical marijuana under DC laws;
  • Provide emergency care within the scope of their skills;
  • Refer patients to appropriate licensed physicians or other health care providers;
  • Certify to utility company that a client has a serious illness or the need for life-support equipment;
  • Witness an advanced directive;
  • Sign off on home health/care orders.
Anesthesiologists and applying anesthesia

The concern: As seen below, additional allied health professions are permitted to apply anesthesia. Most concerning is the scope expansion that could permit nurse anesthetists to practice without physician collaboration.

The details: See our one-pager on this issue that you can share with colleagues and the Council

The solution: This bill asks to repeal Section 603 of DC official code ₰3-1206.03, and this action will allow nurse anesthetists to administer anesthesia without an anesthesiologist or other physician's direct collaboration. Language seeking repeal of Section 603 of DC official code ₰3-1206.03 should not be included.

This bill adds Sec. 605a, which contains language that a CRNA may plan and deliver anesthesia, pain management, and related care to patients or clients of all health complexities across the lifespan. Language adding Sec. 605a should be removed from this bill.

Athletic Trainers
The bill repeals law that requires limiting athletic trainers to only providing first aid, opening the door to athletic trainers potentially practicing some form of medicine.
Audiologists

The expands audiologists' scope to include "cerumen management" and "interoperative neurophysiologic monitoring" and permits audiologists to screen for cognitive, depression and vision.

Chiropractors

The bill completely rewrites the definition of the practice of "chiropractic". Chiropractors could:

  • Diagnose and treat biomechanical or physiological conditions that compromise neural integrity or organ system function
  • Refer patients for further medical treatment or diagnostic testing

The details: See our one-pager on this issue that you can share with colleagues and the Council

Clinical lab technicians

The bill would not longer have physicians overseeing their work but instead a clinical laboratory director

Pharmacists

The bill would expand pharmacists' scope to include:

  • Ordering labs
  • Scheduling and monitoring drug therapy
  • Ordering, interpreting, and performing more tests

The details: See our one-pager on this issue that you can share with colleagues and the Council

Physical Therapists

The bill would permit physical therapists to independently evaluate and treat disability, injury, or disease. PTs may also order imaging as part of their treatment plan.

Podiatrists

The concern: The bill expands podiatrists scope of practice to allow:

  • apply anesthesia as part of treatment; and
  • administer vaccines and injections.

The details: See our one-pager on this issue that you can share with colleagues and the Council

The solution: This bill amends Paragraph (14) of D.C. Official Code § 3-1201.02(14) to define "Practice of podiatry” to include the administration of local anesthesia, monitored anesthesia care, and conscious sedation. Other scope of practice expansions for podiatry include care of human hand and wrist, and administration of injections, vaccinations, and immunizations. Podiatrists should not be administering monitored anesthesia care. Podiatrists do not have the qualifications and training to manage a patient's airway so this language should be stricken.

Nursing

Throughout the bill, restrictions on nursing scope of practice are removed or loosened throughout. Specific language outlining what and how nurses can practice is removed and replaced with more vague language giving the Mayor (read DC Health) the ability to dictate scope. This applies to many different nursing types, like APRNs and NPs.

Articles on scope of practice

 

ACT NOW: Join MSDC letter opposing scope changes

Apr 18, 2024, 15:59 PM by MSDC Staff
Sign on to the physician letter asking the Council to remove scope of practice changes to B25-545.

MSDC is asking all physicians to join a letter asking the Committee on Health to remove all scope of practice expansion provisions from the HORA reform bill.

B25-545 would update the DC law regulating healthcare licensing in the District. While we have been successful in educating the Council on why some provisions need to be removed, many onerous changes remain. You can see what many of these changes are here.

The Council will be holding a final vote in May unless we convince them to make changes now. Our letter (printed below) will allow you to show the Council how the physician community opposes these changes and how important it is to remove this language.

Join the letter here.

To become involved in this initiative, visit the Physician Voices for Patient Safety or contact MSDC.

Phil Mendelson
Council of the District of Columbia
1350 Pennsylvania Ave NW
Washington, DC 20004

Dear Chairman Mendelson:

We, the undersigned physicians, urge you to remove any language in B25-545 that expands the scope of practice of allied health providers. 88% of DC physicians oppose the bill (according to a survey conducted by MSDC in March 2024 among physicians licensed to practice in Washington, DC).

Our patients deserve the safest care. A physician is the most highly trained provider on a patient’s care team. Physicians work closely with patients and other medical professionals to diagnose and treat illnesses and injuries. We take the lead on patient care because physicians have the most extensive medical training of any healthcare professional. Unlike other healthcare professionals, physicians have undergone 11-15 years of education and training after school, including four years of medical school, 3-7 years of residency/fellowship training, and up to 16,000 supervised patient care hours.

B25-545 is a bill to update the statute governing healthcare professionals, but it includes major scope of practice changes for other health professionals. In other states, removing the physician from the care team has led to worse health outcomes to patients and more expensive care for the communities where they live.

This bill is dangerous for patient care and DC residents will be harmed by expanding scope of practice to undertrained practitioners. As a physician licensed in the District, I urge you to remove all new scope of practice changes in B25-545 when you mark up the bill.

Sincerely,